Providing distributed system integrity under spatial grasp technology.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.34121/1028-9763-2023-2-18–27Keywords:
distributed systems, system integrity, Spatial Grasp Technology, self-evolving scenarios, distributed system self-recovery, system immortality, розподілені системи, цілісність системи, Технології просторового захоплення, сценарії, що самостійно розвиваються, самовідновлення розподіленої системи, вічність системиAbstract
In the last decades, we have witnessed an exploding growth of different kinds of sophisticated distributed systems with financial, industrial, ecological, security, military, and many other applications. Providing high integrity of such systems is becoming a key point of their development, evolution, and usage, especially in various crisis situations and under disastrous and adversarial conditions. The paper reviews a number of existing works on the integrity, security, and recovery of distributed systems. It also briefs the main aspects of the Spatial Grasp Model and Technology (SGT), reflecting some general issues of the paradigm, its Spatial Grasp Language (SGL), and networked SGL interpretation in distributed environments. SGT can dynamically establish and keep superior power over large distributed systems, including creating them from scratch. Using a graph-based representation of the distributed system topologies, with nodes having both virtual and physical properties, the paper shows full topology creation starting from all nodes in parallel and then from a single node, also copying the existing topology in similar cases. In addition, it demonstrates how to organize distributed systems in such a way so that they can self-recover in any circumstances and after any damages by supplying their nodes with universal genetic-like capabilities by which any self-repairs can be organized. Such recovery may be from missing neighboring nodes and links to the rebuilding of the distributed topologies, which means they cannot be destroyed even in the severest conditions. These features can be particularly useful after IT network damages, environmental and industrial disasters, for crisis management, and on battlefields. The paper confirms the efficiency of the developed distributed control approach for providing high integrity and self-recovery of important distributed systems.References
1. Mittal M., Sangani R., Srivastava K. Testing Data Integrity in Distributed Systems. Procedia Computer Science. 2015. Vol. 45. P. 446–452. URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877050915003130.
2. Rauter T. Integrity of Distributed Control Systems. Student Forum of the 46th Annual IEEE/IFIP International Conference on Dependable Systems and Networks. Toulouse, France, 2016. June. URL: https://hal.science/hal-01318372/file/DSN-Student-Forum_%237_Integrity-of-Distributed-ControlSystems.pdf.
3. Sivanandham G., Gnanasekar J.M. Data Integrity and Recovery Management in Cloud Systems. Proc. of the Fourth International Conference on Inventive Systems and Control (ICISC 2020). URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/343751352_Data_Integrity_and_Recovery_Management_in_Cloud_Systems.
4. Sodhi G.K. Recovery and Security in Distributed System. International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer and Communication Engineering. 2015. Vol. 4, Issue 12. URL: https://www.ijarcce.com/upload/2015/december-15/IJARCCE%20105.pdf.
5. Sun X., Chen J., Zhao H., Zhang W., Zhang Y. Sequential Disaster Recovery Strategy for Resilient Distribution Network Based on Cyber-Physical Collaborative Optimization. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid. 2023. Vol. 14, N 2. P. 1173–1187. DOI: 10.1109/TSG.2022.3198696. URL: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9857641.
6. Popa-Simil V., Poston H., Thomas Mrs., Popa-Simil L. Self-recovery of a distributed system after a large disruption. New Mexico Supercomputing Challenge: Final Report. 2012. April 1. URL: http://www.supercomputingchallenge.org/11-12/finalreports/15.pdf.
7. Watanabe Y., Sato S., Ishida Y. An Approach for Self-Repair in Distributed System Using ImmunityBased Diagnostic Mobile Agents. Knowledge-Based Intelligent Information and Engineering Systems: 8th International Conference, KES 2004. Wellington, New Zealand, 2004. September 20–25. URL: https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-540-30133-2_66.
8. Farley A.M., Proskurowski A. Minimum Self-Repairing Graphs. Graphs and Combinatorics. 1997. Issue 13. P. 345–351. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03353012. URL: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF03353012.
9. Hafaiedh I.B., Slimane M.B. A distributed formal-based model for self-healing behaviors in autonomous systems: from failure detection to self-recovery. The Journal of Supercomputing volume. 2022. Vol. 78. P. 18725–18753. URL: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/ s11227-022-04614-0.
10. Nikolic J., Jubatyrov N., Pournaras E. Self-Healing Dilemmas in Distributed Systems: Fault Correction vs. Fault Tolerance. Journal of Latex Class Files. 2021. Vol. X, N X. URL: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2007.05261.pdf.
11. Quattrociocchi W., Caldarelli G., Scala A. Self-Healing Networks: Redundancy and Structure. PLOS One. 2014. Vol. 9, Issue 2. URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal. pone.0087986.
12. Rodriguez A., Gomez J., Diaconescu A. A decentralized self-healing approach for network topology maintenance. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems. 2021. Vol. 35. P. 1743–1745. URL: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10458-020-09486-3.
13. Sapaty P.S. A distributed processing system: European Patent N 0389655. Publ. 10.11.93. European Patent Office. 35 p.
14. Sapaty P.S. Mobile Processing in Distributed and Open Environments. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1999. 436 p.
15. Sapaty P.S. Ruling Distributed Dynamic Worlds. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 2005. 255 p.
16. Sapaty P.S. Managing Distributed Dynamic Systems with Spatial Grasp Technology. Springer, 2017. 284 p.
17. Sapaty P.S. Holistic Analysis and Management of Distributed Social Systems. Springer, 2018. 234 p.
18. Sapaty P.S. Complexity in International Security: A Holistic Spatial Approach. Emerald Publishing, 2019. 160 p.
19. Sapaty P.S. Symbiosis of Real and Simulated Worlds under Spatial Grasp Technology. Springer, 2021. 251 p.
20. Sapaty P.S. Spatial Grasp as a Model for Space-Based Control and Management Systems. CRC Press, 2022. 280 p.
21. Sapaty P.S. The Spatial Grasp Model: Applications and Investigations of Distributed Dynamic Worlds. Emerald Publishing, 2023. 184 p.
22. Sapaty P.S. Distributed Control Technology for Air and Missile Defence Operations. International Relations and Diplomacy. 2022. Vol. 10, N 4. P. 141–157. DOI: 10.17265/2328-2134/2022.04.001. URL: https://www.davidpublisher.com/Public/uploads/Contribute/ 6364741a7b432.pdf.
23. Sapaty P.S. Relation of Spatial Grasp Paradigm to Higher Psychological and Mental Concepts. Acta Scientific Computer Sciences. 2022. Vol. 4, Issue 12. URL: https://actascientific.com/ASCS/pdf/ASCS04-0359.pdf.
24. Sapaty P.S. Seeing and Managing Distributed Worlds with Spatial Grasp Paradigm. Acta Scientific Computer Sciences. 2022. Vol. 4, Issue 12. URL: https://actascientific.com/ ASCS/pdf/ASCS-04-0365.pdf.
25. Sapaty P.S. Comprehending Distributed Worlds with the Spatial Grasp Paradigm. Mathematical machines and systems. 2022. N 1. P. 12–30. URL: http://www.immsp.kiev.ua/ publications/articles/2022/2022_1/01_22_Sapaty.pdf.
26. Sapaty P.S. Spatial management of air and missile defence operations. Mathematical machines and systems. 2023. N 1. P. 30–49. URL: http://www.immsp.kiev.ua/publications/articles/2023/2023_1/01_23_Sapaty.pdf.
128
22Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Mathematical Machines and Systems
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
