Post-publishing
Post-publication discussion and changes.
The editorial board of the journal encourages authors and readers to engage in active post-publication communication, constructive discussion of the results of published research, identification of prospects for their application, and the expression of doubts regarding the argumentation or the significance of an article for the advancement of science. During the discussion of articles, no comment may contain insults toward any of the authors, editors, or reviewers, nor include discriminatory remarks, subjective judgments, and/or evaluative statements about the journal’s work.
Acceptable and minor errors in a published article that do not affect its content or the scientific integrity of the research (including typographical errors, inactive links, incorrect page numbers in article headers, etc.) may be corrected by publishing amendments — especifically by replacing the original PDF file with a corrected version. The printed version of the article remains unchanged.
Significant errors, if the research conclusions are based on them, may may cause the article to be withdrawn from the corresponding issue of the journal.
Authors may also independently initiate the retraction of an article at their own discretion by submitting a free-form written request addressed to the editor-in-chief of the journal.
