Spatial management of large constellations of small satellites
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.34121/1028-9763-2021-2-3-14Keywords:
satellite constellations and mega-constellations, global communication, Earth and space observation, Spatial Grasp Technology, constellation management, recursive spatial scenarios, space debris, угрупування супутників та мега-угрупування, глобальні комунікації, спостереження за Землею та космосом, Технологія просторового захоплення, управління угрупуваннями, рекурсивні просторові сценарії, космічне сміттяAbstract
The number of satellites in low Earth orbits is predicted to grow over 100,000 in the coming years due to the launch of planned satellite constellations which are often called mega-constellations because of their expected size. They are appealing mostly for global communications, Earth and space observation, as well as for global security and defense. Despite their attractiveness, implementation of satellite constellations is connected with many problems. Among these problems are the necessity of advanced inter-satellite links, onboard management, high-duty Earth terminals and gateways, avoidance of collisions with other satellites and debris, etc. Up to now, no system models and infrastructures have been offered for such large fleets of satellites. The paper summarizes the developed Spatial Grasp Model and Technology (SGT) and its high-level Spatial Grasp Language (SGL), and investigates their applicability for management of large satellite constellations. Embedding cooperating SGL interpreters into all satellites allows to convert the whole constellation into an intelligent system capable of solving numerous problems autonomously, reducing communication with complex ground antennas. The paper shows some basic operations on satellite constellations including broadcasting orders to the whole constellation, collecting information from all satellites and emergent restructuring of the whole constellation. Based on the experience with previous SGT versions, the approach based on virus-like coverage of large spaces allows to implement it even within university environments. Recursive scenarios in SGL are much more compact than under other approaches which may be important for reducing load and interference with other space communications.References
1. Dredge K., M. von Arx, Timmins I. LEO constellations and tracking challenges. URL: www.satelliteevolution.com.
2. Curzi G., Modenini D., Tortora P. Review Large Constellations of Small Satellites: A Survey of Near Future Challenges and Missions. Aerospace. 2020. N 7. P. 133. URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2226-4310/7/9/133/htm.
3. Venkatesan A., Lowenthal J., Prem P., Vidaurri M. The impact of satellite constellations on space as an ancestral global commons. Nature Astronomy. 2020. Vol. 4. P. 1043–1048. URL: www.nature.com/natureastronomy.
4. Skibba R. How satellite mega-constellations will change the way we use space. MIT Technology Review. 2020. February 26. URL: https://www.technologyreview.com/2020/02/26/905733/satellite-megaconstellations-change-the-way-we-use-space-moon-mars/.
5. Minet M. The Space Legal Issues with Megs-Constellations. Space Legal Issues. 2020. November 3. URL: https://www.spacelegalissues.com/mega-constellations-a-gordian-knot/.
6. Siegel E. Astronomy Faces A Mega-Crisis As Satellite Mega-Constellations Loom. URL: https://www.forbes.com/sites/startswithabang/2021/01/19/astronomy-faces-a-mega-crisis-as-satellite-mega-constellations-loom/?sh=30597dca300d.
7. Jones A. China is developing plans for a 13,000-satellite mega-constellation. Space News. 2021. April 21. URL: https://spacenews.com/china-is-developing-plans-for-a-13000-satellite-communications-megaconstella-tion/.
8. Reilanda N., Rosengren A J., Malhotra R., Bombardelli C. Assessing and minimizing collisions in satellite mega-constellations. Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of COSPAR. 2021. URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0273117721000326.
9. Fous J. Mega-constellations and mega-debris. URL: https://www.thespacereview.com/article/3078/1.
10. Sapaty P.S. Symbiosis of Real and Simulated Worlds under Spatial Grasp Technology, Springer, 2021. 251 p.
11. Sapaty P.S. Complexity in International Security: A Holistic Spatial Approach, Emerald Publishing, 2019. 160 p.
12. Sapaty P.S. Holistic Analysis and Management of Distributed Social Systems, Springer, 2018. 234 p.
13. Sapaty P.S. Managing Distributed Dynamic Systems with Spatial Grasp Technology, Springer, 2017. 284 p.
14. Sapaty P.S. Ruling Distributed Dynamic Worlds. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 2005. 255 p.
15. Sapaty P.S. Mobile Processing in Distributed and Open Environments. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1999. 410 p.
16. Sapaty P.S. A distributed processing system, European Patent N 0389655, Publ. 10.11.93, European Patent Office. 35 p.
17. Sapaty P.S Managing multiple satellite architectures by Spatial Grasp Technology. Mathematical machines and systems. 2021. N 1. P. 3–16. URL: http://www.immsp.kiev.ua/publications/eng/2021_1/.
18. Sapaty Р.S. Spatial Grasp as a Model for Space-based Control and Management Systems. Mathematical machines and systems. 2021. N 1. P. 135–138. http://www.immsp.kiev.ua/publications/articles/2021/2021_1/ Sapaty_book_1_2021.pdf.
19. Sapaty Р.S. Global Network Management under Spatial Grasp Paradigm. Global Journal of Researches in Engineering: J General Engineering. 2020. Vol. 20, Issue 5. URL: https://engineeringresearch.org/index.php/GJRE/article/view/2082/2013.
Стаття надійшла до редакції 17.03.2021
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Mathematical Machines and Systems

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
